All Information I've collected on the grooming gang's scandal UK.

Where it all started.

All Information I've collected on the grooming gangs scandal UK.

I've done this in the hope that someone does their own research into the topic and makes up their own mind.

Where it all started.

In 2002, when the Labour MP for Keighley, Ann Cryer became the first public figure in Britain to talk out about allegations of "young Asian lads" grooming underage white girls in the West Yorkshire town.

As a result, she was shunned by elements of her party, a panic button was installed in her house and Nick Griffin stood against her for the far-right British National party (BNP), claiming that she was not doing enough to protect young white girls.

Cryer's battle began when seven mothers came to her to claim that their daughters had been groomed by young men from the Pakistani community. "They said the girls were being used for sex by them and handed around - not as prostitutes but were being handed around the families of these lads. This was underage sex. These girls were well below 16. (source The Gardian-30^th August 2014 by Helen Pidd)

The Alex Jay report released in 2014 (A British academic and independent chair of the centre for excellence for children's care and protection) Found that 1,400 women and girls in Rotherham were subjected to sexual exploitation as children by multiple gangs between 1997 and 2013 in the UKs biggest sex abuse scandal. Independant inquire by Alexis Jay-independent-inquiry-into-child-sexual-exploitation-in-rotherham

Alex Jay also headed an independent inquire for 7 years into sexual abuse but the towns they picked to identify if this was mainly a Pakistani issue, had a very low Asian population and no history of sexual abuse claims. Nothing was found.The Report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse | IICSA Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse

But Alex was not the first to publicly break the story with some sort of success, Andrew Norfolk was, a British journalist and chief investigative reporter for the Times. (so he was never working for some right-wing publication in-fact a very left-wing publication) I highlight this because the mainstream media likes to paint a narrative that its some racist right-wing conspiracy theory.

He broke the story officially in 2011 and become known for his reporting on the Rotherham child exploitation scandal.

The Times newspaper reported Andrew saying in 2014-

“Our first story was published on January 5, 2011. Accompanied by four inside pages, the headline on the front-page splash was: "Revealed: conspiracy of silence on UK sex gangs. Most convicted offenders of Pakistani heritage. Young girls abused across North and Midlands." The public outcry was instant. Fuel was thrown on the flames a couple of days later when a former home secretary, Jack Straw, stated that some Pakistani

men in his Blackburn constituency regarded young white girls as "easy meat". The government swiftly ordered a national inquiry.

Please watch a documentary called “things we won't say about race that are true” by Trevor Phillips made in 2015. Andrew goes into more depth about the grooming gangs, and how the police made a film which starred an Asian man, then pressure was put on the police to change the actor to a White man. Not representing the reality of the situation.

The Louise Casy report in 2015- found that the councillor's in Rotherham was covering up the abuse which led to them all being sacked and replaced, but no one really being held to account, not one person prosecuted. Reflections on child sexual exploitation: a report by Louise Casey CB - GOV.UK

Sikh Youth UK- A group who also tried to expose the grooming gangs targeting Sikh girls. Alleged grooming of Sikh girls by Muslim men.

A BBC Inside Out (London) programme televised in September 2013 interviewed several young Sikh women who were allegedly groomed and sexually abused by Muslim men, with one alleged ex-groomer even admitting that they specifically targeted Sikh girls. Bhai Mohan Singh, working for the Sikh Awareness Society (SAS), told the BBC he was investigating 19 alleged cases where Sikh girls were allegedly being groomed by older Muslim men, of which one ended with a successful conviction.

In August 2013 four Muslims and two Hindus were convicted at Leicester Crown Court of paying a "Vulnerable and damaged" 16-year-old Sikh girl for sex, the investigation having been opened due to evidence Bhai Mohan Singh had presented to the police.

However, a report published the previous year by Faith Matters (which runs the TELL MAMA anti-Muslim violence helpline and works closely with the Jewish Community Security Trust[97)) claimed that the Sikh Awareness Society included radical anti-Muslim elements among its members; Faith Matters furthermore, alleged it was a matter of "common consensus" that the radical Sikhs said to have had secret meetings with the English Defence League were members of the SAS.

The SAS denied allegations and distanced themselves from the organization, a spokesperson telling Hope not Hate: "We would have nothing to do with any racist or fascist group, certainly one that uses religion to divide people ... l know nothing about this and no, we are not in any kind of talks and discussion with them".

The Nihal Show on the BBC Asian Network discussed the issue and debated the merits of the grooming claims in September 2013. In 2018, a report by a Sikh activist organisation, Sikh Youth UK, entitled "The Religiously Aggravated Sexual Exploitation of Young Sikh Women Across the UK" made allegations of similarities between the case of Sikh Women and the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal.

The Report from Sikh Youth UK-THE RELIGIOUSLY AGGRAVATED SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF YOUNG SIKH WOMEN ACROSS THE UK - smart

However, in 2019 this report was criticised by researchers and an official UK government report lead by two Sikh academics for false and misleading information. It noted: "The RASE report lacks solid data, methodological transparency and rigour. It is filled instead with sweeping generalisations and poorly substantiated claims around the nature and scale of abuse of Sikh girls and causal factors driving it. It appealed heavily to historical tensions between Sikhs and Muslims and narratives of honour in a way that seemed designed to whip up fear and hate".

You can see the above push back from the media and charity groups and academics, always putting the label on groups/people as far-right.

WARNING EXPLICIT CONTENT BELOW.

Grooming gang crimes motivated by racial prejudice (source oplndia) Dr Ella Hill- Grooming gang survivor says the below.

Shedding pretentious nuances surrounding discussions related to race and religion, Dr. Ella Hill emphasised, "Alot of it has to do with race and religion. Alot of people don't like talking about it or they don't like to hear about it."

She reiterated that crimes committed by the grooming gangs are motivated by religious and racial prejudice against the victim. She narrated, "When I was being beaten, I was called a white slag, white whore and white cunt (sic)."

Dr. Hill pointed out that her white skin was always on the mind of her Muslim perpetrator. She revealed that grooming gangs viewed white girls as 'easy meat' because they sing, dance, drink alcohol - things considered 'immoral' and 'worthy of punishment (rape and beating in this case) "It (My torture) was linked to his idea of what a good Muslim was and a bad non- Muslim was or a good believer and a bad unbeliever."

Without mincing any words, she said that even though she was a devout Christian, yet her Muslim perpetrator believed that she asked to be raped as she wasn't 'fully covered' from her head to toe. She further revealed that nonadherence to Islamic rules and customs gave them a licence to use, throw, and abuse non-Muslim women. "If white girls look at a Muslim man in the eyes that means they are asking to have sex with them," Dr.Hill unearthed the distorted mindset behind the idea of grooming gangs.

Violation of Islamic teachings meant 'punishment'

Dr. Hill informed that her Muslim perpetrator viewed anything contrary to Islamic teachings as worthy of 'punishment.' She said, "There are a lot of narratives within these grooming gangs which make hatred of white people a justification for what they are doing." The medical practitioner highlighted how the grooming gangs use 'scriptures' to justify rape after a young girl hits her period. She said that the perpetrators rely on vying, a type of molestation that is devoid of vaginal penetration, to abuse minor girls if they are yet to have their period.

Grooming gangs bolstered by police nonaction.

On being asked if she approached the police, Dr. Hill conceded, "I went to the police 5 times. But they said that they can do nothing about it. Those were their exact words." She said that as a teenager, she was unsure whether it was rape, even though her perpetrators said that they we're going to gang-rape her.

"I did not understand what the law was . .as he was my boyfriend .. but the police should have understood. The interviewers then asked her about the indifferent behaviour of the police towards her. She said, "At that time, there was a culture of inaction. The same was found in a police review. Plus, it's your words vs theirs."

Highlighting the dismal condition of the justice system, she said that most of the time, there is no evidence to prove it.

19,000 children sexually abused in England in 2019

According to the official figures, it is being estimated that nearly 19,000 minors in England were sexually groomed in England in the last year. Reportedly, the local authorities in England have identified around 18,700 suspected victims in 2018-19, up from 3,300 five years ago. The latest figures showed a sharp increase in the number of child grooming victims over the last five years. The highest rates of child grooming victims in Britain were reported in areas including Birmingham, Lancashire, and Bradford. Speaking to the media, Sarah Champion, the Labour MP for Rotherham, which has been targeted by child grooming gangs, said that figures show this type of exploitation 'remains one of the largest forms of child abuse in the country'.

Syrian Grooming Gang Brothers

Statement from the BBC: "In 2015 and 2016,

Newsnight followed the story of the Badreddin family, who were Syrian refugees who had settled in the UK. During the year, their son Omar was tried for sexual assault and found not guilty. Two years afterwards, in 2018 and 2019, Omar Badreddin and his brother Mohamed committed multiple counts of rape. They were found guilty and were jailed on 1 March 2024. The BBC reported this. In any situation, the BBC can only report on the facts as they stand at the time, which is what we did in this case.

The below is report carried out by Quilliam a British think tank co-founded in 2008 by Maajid Nawaz, Rashas Zaman Ali and Ed Hussain that focused on counter extremism. The report was posted on 14^th December 2017

The report- (please search the internet for the report as Quilliam was dissolved in 2021, I wonder why? because the report shows how 84% of all grooming gang convictions are Pakistani, or maybe not.Please go and read the above study for yourself.

Huddersfield grooming gang Article Talk

The Huddersfield grooming gang was a group of men who were convicted of sexual offences against girls in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. It is the largest gang ever convicted for sex abuse in the United Kingdom. The offences took place between 2004 and 2011, and the men were charged following the Operation Tendersea inquiry by the police. The trials began in April 2017 and 20 men were convicted in 2018 in three separate trials. Since then, further men have been convicted in a series of trials, bringing the total number of perpetrators convicted to 41 by August.

The Grooming Gangs of England Courtesy of: Samvit Kendra (Source www.arisebharat.com)

What is termed as #LoveJihad Or #RapeJihad largely in Bharat, is rather sophisticatedly called "grooming" in England and other Western countries. We are publishing this here since the issue is similar in Bharat. This paper by Dr. Rahul Shastri explores the entire grooming methodology and their overall design.

THE ENDLESS AGONY OF ENGLAND'S DAUGHTERS

Hundreds of thousands of minor English girl children may have been sexually exploited over the past two and a half decades, according to Ms. Sarah Champion, Labour MP from Rotherham.[1]

HOW MANY IN AGONY?

A 2012 UK study confirms that in fourteen months alone, 2409 English girls were victims of sexual exploitation in gangs and groups. While these are the confirmed victims in 14 months, government estimates put another 20,000 children at risk of sexual exploitation for the time period in the UK.

There are no estimates of the total number of girl children exploited over the last two decades, excepting in Rotherham. An administrative inquiry into child sexual abuse in Rotherham by Ms Jay, estimated that in 16 years (1997-2013), approximately 1400 minor girls were sexually exploited.

Based on sampling, the report estimated that a large number of the 988 case files with social care and police, actually described victims. It also relied on hundreds of cases discussed by Sexual Exploitation Forum and Strategy meetings, and data available with Risky Business to arrive at this figure. Please go read the rest of the article for yourself.

As we have seen some compelling evidence above. the mainstream media and institutions would gas light the public in having them believe it's some racist right wing conspiracy theory. Just a few articles from the mainstream media

(Left)Study published by Dr Ella Cockbain In 2013/ (right) her chart from 2018

Now let's Debunk the Debunkers

Debunking the grooming gang debunkers.

The focus on this issue is right and proper. ARTILLERY ROW 29 May 2023 By Guy Dampier (Sourse www.thecritic.co.uk)

Inaccurate' grooming gang claims putting children at risk" read the Guardian headline, as it reported a new open letter. Hosted by the University of Bedfordshire and signed (so far) by 60 organisations or researchers, it warned the Prime Minister and Home Secretary against making "partial, inaccurate or divisive claims about child sexual abuse".

What the letter is really worried about is the government's focus on "group-based child sexual exploitation in the community" - commonly known as "Grooming gangs". In the aftermath of the GB News film "Grooming Gangs: Britain's Shame" Home Secretary Suella Braverman announced new measures, including a new Grooming Gangs Taskforce, which was one of the policies the documentary called for.

The documentary recounted the story of the grooming gang's scandal and showed that the issue was still going on. What really upset people, however, was the focus by Braverman on ethnicity: in places like Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford, the "Overwhelming majority" of the perpetrators were British Pakistani, whilst their victims

were white. As the title of an article by Braverman stated however, "the truth can't be racist".

These numbers demonstrate rape on an industrial scale

The open letter argues that singling out anyone "type" of abuse as being especially heinous and worthy of attention is "ineffective and unethical". In particular it says focusing on the identity of those in grooming gangs runs contrary to the evidence, citing the 2020 Home Office report into the issue.

It risks overlooking other groups of victims, claims the letter, and it draws attention away from other potential perpetrators. All of this ignores the reality of the grooming gang's scandal.

Whilst all forms of child abuse are heinous, the grooming gangs stand out for their scale. We know that in Rotherham over 1,500 girls were abused, whilst in Telford at least 1,000 girls were abused.

Most other locations where grooming gangs have been convicted have yet to complete full inquiries; as such the total number of victims of the gangs is unknown. Even so these are huge numbers, demonstrating rape on an industrial scale, which has no other comparison in 21st century Britain.

Furthermore, there is a communal element. Although British Pakistanis were a small minority in both Rotherham and Telford, inquiries in those towns found the majority of abusers were drawn from that community, whilst most of their victims were white.

Although it is true that they could also abuse people within their own community – Shabir Ahmed, ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang, also abused a British Pakistani girl - the vast majority of their victims were white. Reports from those victims make it clear that they were often targeted for their race, as well as being subjected to racial abuse.

This is, however, a rare case where the Guardian and academics are uninterested in racism. It's obviously not true that they themselves think that focusing on one particular type of crime is wrong. After all, hate crimes against Muslims account for a mere 3,459 of the total 155,841 hate crimes in 2021-22.

Yet academics and the Guardian are quite happy to focus on a subject like Islamophobia. I've yet to see an open letter suggesting that this is wrong, or that it might lead to Buddhist victims of hate crime being overlooked. Meanwhile, the claim that the 2020 Home Office report showed no link between the type of perpetrator and victims is flatly wrong.

As Dan Hodges revealed, civil servants tried their hardest to avoid even releasing the report. When they finally did so, the report was so heavily flawed that then Home Secretary Priti Patel should have refused to publish it, as the report has since been used to argue that the matter is settled, even though it admits there are huge gaps in the data it uses.

Rather than conduct original research using Home Office resources, the report relies on a summary of five academic papers.

These generally show that whites make up the largest group but also show that ethnic minorities, especially Asians are heavily over-represented. That would confirm the original claim made by Andrew Norfolk in The Times, when he first broke the story of the grooming gangs: that the majority of abusers in Britain were white, but that there was an over-representation of British Pakistanis, especially in this type of crime.

Many are embarrassed that ethnic minorities can be racist to whites, too It's also obviously absurd to say that focusing on this crime could lead to other victims being overlooked, when one of the main reasons why the grooming gang's scandal was so scandalous was that it was overlooked, deliberately, for decades.

When Anne Cryer MP first raised the subject in 2003, she was called a racist and had to install a panic button at home. In 2004 Edge of the City, a Channel 4 documentary about social workers in Bradford, which also covered what we now know as grooming gangs, was dropped from schedules after a lobbying campaign by anti-racist groups.

In both Rotherham and Rochdale, it was only the bravery of whistleblowers Jayne Senior and Maggie Oliver that led to the scandals there reaching the news at all.

Inquiries showed that senior figures in the council and police either failed to do anything or did their best to keep it from the public - in many cases, over fears that they might look racist for tackling it. As the GB News documentary showed, that extended to a break-in of the offices of a Rotherham youth project, which had been working with a Home Office researcher on exposing the issue.

As for the worry that it might lead to an over-focus on one type of perpetrator, the way the media responded to the grooming gang scandal shows that this is unlikely. Despite being the worst child sex abuse scandal in 21st century Britain, there has been only one drama, released in 2017.

In the northern soap opera Coronation Street, the only two grooming plotlines have involved a white man trying to pimp his younger white girlfriend and a white boy being recruited by a group of far-right extremists. When the authorities made an educational film in 2008 about a white girl being groomed by her Asian boyfriend, it was never distributed widely.

If people have focused on grooming gangs, that's often because without that the authorities would have continued to ignore the issue. If people have focused on ethnicity, that's both because it is true, because the racial element was a significant reason why the truth was hidden for so long, and because it's relevant to why the crimes were perpetrated. If anything, it is the victims of grooming gangs who have been overlooked whilst the identity of abusers hasn't been focused on enough. There's no need to drag race or religion in: Pakistan has high rates of child abuse, and some British Pakistani immigrants have retained elements of the culture that leads to that abuse. The Guardian and so many academics only seem to be concerned about focusing too much on racism in this one case, which suggests that their hostility isn't rooted in concern about the facts so much as it is in embarrassment about the reality that ethnic minorities can be racist to whites, too. By trying to shut down discussion of the subject, they risk repeating the same shameful behaviour that led to the grooming gangs being hushed up for years. The result of that was hundreds if not thousands more raped girls. As the GB News documentary and the Home Secretary have shown, the truth is uncomfortable - but it isn't racist.

If you would like to continue to read the article, please go to the start for source.

We have leaders like Sadiq Khan mayor of London, when asked the questions about whether London has a problem with grooming gangs, he asked Ms Hall repeatedly to clarify what she means by grooming gangs. Seems to me like Mr Khan is trying to deflect the question. (source The Daily Mail)

Just something to think about below. (Source- www.girlsnotbrides.org)

Fast forward to today 2023-2025-In 2023 Prime Minister Rishi Sunak set up a grooming gang's task force showing we still have a massive problem today.

Source-www.gov.uk)

In the last 12 months the crack team of expert investigators and analysts have helped police forces arrest over 550 suspects, identify and protect over 4,000 victims, and build up robust cases to get justice for these appalling crimes. Established by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in April 2023, the Grooming Gangs Taskforce of specialist officers

have worked with all 43 police forces in England and Wales to support child sexual exploitation and grooming investigations.

As we can see Grooming Gangs are very much still operating decades later from Ann Cryer's report and they,the mainstream media are still spewing the same right-wing nonsense.

Please see the article below.

(Source-Documentary- EXPOSED: how immigration has caused a rape crisis in Britain and Europe shocking statistics revealed.)

Statistics-on rape perpetrators by ethnic.

Journalist Charlie Peters has taken on the task in 2025 to keep exposing these grooming gangs. As the TV journalist has said on GB News-

"The grooming gang's scandal is the gravest atrocity in modern British history, possibly the worst since the Second World War. In cities, towns and communities across Britain, thousands of children- predominantly white, working-class girls - were systematically groomed, abused, raped, trafficked, tortured and defiled by thousands. First reports of this abuse by predominantly Pakistani men were made i.e. the 1960s in Bradford. Newspaper reports resurfaced again in the 1970s. This time in Rotherham, Then the trail went cold, only for reporting on this form of child abuse to return to media coverage in the late 1990s. (Watch The UNCENSORED Truth About Grooming Gangs - Charlie Peters on Triggernometry for a deep dive into the topic)

Are the mainstream media still gas lighting the public?

BBC published an article in Jan 2025 on Romanian grooming gangs and mentions no link to Pakistani men. But in 2017 the BBC published the article below-

The Artical from 2017 states-

“According to Angelika Molnar, who runs Europol's human trafficking unit, the victims were encouraged to leave poverty and deprivation in countries such as Romania and Slovakia with the prospect of a well-paid job in Scotland. (same nationality and same location as the BBC article in 2025 but no mention of the “Asian link”)

"It's only upon arrival that they are told there is no work available, and they have to be engaged in marriages with Pakistani men," she said. Ms Molnar said the potential grooms wanted to stay in Scotland but needed marriage to an EU citizen to be able to apply for residency.

"After the marriage, the women are kept under control by the traffickers and are exploited as domestic service by the husband but also raped and sexually exploited by fellow nationals of the traffickers," she said. Ms Molnar said people were now the second most lucrative criminal commodity after drugs, with labour and sexual exploitation the most common reasons for trafficking to Scotland”.

Scottish human trafficking expert Jim Laird told the BBC there was a "clear link" between Eastern European crime gangs and Asian organised crime in Glasgow.

Undercover investigation

The BBC sent investigative journalist Sam Poling undercover to expose the ruthless tactics used in the supply chain. She travelled across Eastern Europe to track down victims sold to Glasgow gangs for sex.

High-profile cases (convicted perpetrators were predominately of Asian/Pakistani heritage.

. Rochdale child sex abuse ring: 12 were initially charged with sex trafficking and other offences including: rape, trafficking girls for sex and conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child. 9 men were convicted, of whom 8 were of British Pakistani origin and one was an Afghan asylum-seeker

. Telford child sexual exploitation scandal: Overall, 9 men were convicted of various sexual offences against four girls aged 13 to 16.

. Oxford child sex abuse ring: 22 men who were convicted of various sexual offences against underage girls.

. Halifax child sex abuse ring: 27 men were convicted of various sexual offences against underage girls.

. Keighley child sex abuse ring: 12 men were convicted of various sexual offences against underage girls.

. Newcastle sex abuse ring: 18 men were convicted of various sexual offences against underage girls.

. Peterborough sex abuse case: 10 men were convicted of various sexual offences against underage girls.

. Derby child sex abuse ring: 9 men were convicted of grooming and raping girls between 12 and 18 years old.

. Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal: 20 people now convicted.

As you can see the mainstream media are still gas lighting the British public. Please watch the documentary (The Betrayed Girls: Rochdale child sex abuse coverup by Henry Singer)

One more example.

The mainstream media released a documentary called The Story Of Eleanor Williams and how she lied about men grooming her, she was then sent to prison for 8 years. Please read the below article.

Little White Lies

Grooming gang apologist are fabricating 'white grooming gangs' LUCA 10 JANUARY AT 06:43 Luca's Substack

The issue of what are euphemistically dubbed 'grooming gangs' has suddenly returned to the spotlight after the world's richest man, Elon Musk, seemed to find out about the atrocity for the first time. For those of us who have known about the scandal for many years - for those, like me, who stumbled upon the Jay Report on Rotherham in our teenage years, the extracts of which have forever remaine

painfully etched in our brains - what has re-emerged into the mainstream airwaves is depressingly familiar.

But perhaps most infuriating is that the same tactics of denial and downplaying of the atrocities - by now well-rehearsed for decades and a large factor in why they were allowed to go on for so long - have re-emerged too.

One such tactic is to deny and obfuscate the explicitly ethno-religious dimension of the abuse. In countless testimonies, victims recount how they were subjected to racial slurs like 'white slag', 'white cunt', and 'gori' (quote from one survivor: 'They made it clear that because I was a non-Muslim, and not a virgin, and because I didn't dress "modestly", that they believed I deserved to be "punished").

The racially aggravated element of these crimes is key to understanding why they took place, as well as why they were covered up.

To acknowledge the racial dimension of the atrocity, and to highlight that these were crimes overwhelmingly perpetrated by specifically Mirpuri men, is to force oneself to address what to most are uncomfortable and prior-busting truths.

So many have opted to either bury their heads in the sand (the charitable take) or engage in brazen atrocity denial and disinformation. Instead of confronting the demographics of the perpetrators, there has been a concerted propaganda campaign to deny that there existed a specific racial pattern at all.

It is claimed that whilst some grooming gangs are indeed made up of 'Asian' men, many others are made up of white British men. Child abusers are said to come from all communities, with no specific group overrepresented. Any emphasis on the racial characteristics of perpetrators is thus rendered suspect and illegitimate.

One way this argument is propagated is by brazenly lying, making it seem like white individuals who were convicted of various other sex crimes were actually convicted of group-based child sexual exploitations, or in other words that they were members of 'white grooming gangs'. This is done in the widely circulated image Below:

The image is in clear reference to another widely-circulated mugshot collage of members of various grooming gangs that operated across Britain. The difference is obvious; in the former, all the abusers are white, in this they are predominantly Asian:

Having read so much on the patterns and make up of grooming gangs, I was immediately suspicious of the first image's veracity. Surely, if there had been so many all-white grooming gangs, at least a few would have broken out into mainstream news?So I did a little digging, and sure enough, it turned out that the mugshots shown were not of grooming gang members at all.

By reverse image searching some of the higher resolution mugshots in the collage, I found that the mugshots shown were of men convicted of sex crimes that were completely unrelated to one another. Of the four men who were made out to seem like they were part of a Manchester grooming gang,

one is a football coach convicted of indecent assault on his young players, one is a police officer who shared images of underage cadets on a paedophile website, one is a 'committed paedophile' convicted of sharing and encouraging videos of babies being raped, and one is a man convicted of multiple child rapes.

Each of the men were convicted of sex crimes, and all were based in Manchester, yet the cases were completely unrelated to one another and had nothing to do with 'white grooming gangs'. Similarly with the collages from Stoke and Huddersfield, mugshots were taken from articles that listed some of the various perpetrators of unrelated sex crimes in those areas from the previous year.

None of them were related to grooming gangs, many were not convicted of child sex crimes, and in one case it was not even related to a person (he raped a horse). So this piece of propaganda that purports to show that Britain is suffering from a scrouge of white grooming gangs is a complete lie.

What it shows is that across Britain there have been some unrelated sex crimes perpetrated by white people. But no one is denying that, nor is it what the whole scandal is about; what is being discussed here is the organised, co-ordinated, community enabled trafficking, rape, and torture of underage girls who were targeted due to their vulnerability and race.

To divert the conversation to cases of sex abuse more generally is to downplay the unique severity of what took place and engage in cynical whataboutism. The intention of this misleading image can also be inferred by the nature of the most prominent people who have been disseminating it.

Some of the biggest accounts who have shared it include Dilly Hussein (editor at 5Pillars), Aboo Hafsah (bio: 'unapologetically Muslim'), journalist Taj Ali, 'historian' Adnan Rashid, 'One Dawah', and many, many more. These are all large accounts with tens, if not hundreds of thousands of followers.

They also all appear to be Muslims, spreading misinformation to cover for their own. This should be of grave concern to any right-minded person. First, because we should all be interested in pursuing the truth for its own sake, and the truth is that though there are some examples of white grooming gangs, the vast majority also all appear to be Muslims, spreading misinformation to cover for their own.

This should be of grave concern to any right-minded person. First, because we should all be interested in pursuing the truth for its own sake, and the truth is that though there are some examples of white grooming gangs, the vast majority are comprised of Pakistanis.

Second, and more pertinently, because it was exactly this attitude of denial of and disinformation about the true nature of the problem that allowed it to go on for so long. Shining a light on the demographics of the perpetrators is a source of discomfort for those of the same community, but it is a discomfort that must be endured and overcome to ensure such atrocities never occur again, and a discomfort that ultimately pales in comparison to the unimaginable torture those poor girls went through.

The Demographic's of grooming gangs

Are Muslims overrepresented?

(Source-Article from Aporia magazine by Noah Carl)

In 2011, Times journalist Andrew North published a bombshell investigation of child sexual abuse in the town of Rotherham, England. Thanks to his reporting, and an independent inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay, we know that between 1997 and 2013 more than 1,400 girls were groomed, sexual abused and (in some cases) violently gang-raped by mostly British Pakistani men.

The incident was notable not only because of the scale of the abuse, but also because of the ethnic dimension (most of the victims were white or non- Muslim Asian), and because of evidence that authorities had failed to act for fear of appearing "racist". In subsequent years, various other examples came to light, and the groups of perpetrators became known as "grooming gangs".

In 2017, the now-defunct thinktank Quilliam published a report titled 'Group Based Child Sexual Exploitation - Dissecting Grooming Gangs'. Based on "extensive data mining", the authors concluded that 84% of those who'd been convicted for grooming gang offences were of South Asian origin – a remarkable figure, given that South Asians comprised only 7% of England's population at the time.

While the report received favourable coverage in right-wing media, it was heavily criticised by some academics and left-wing activists. Writing in the journal Race & Class, Ella Cockbain and Waqas Tufail described it as "shoddy pseudoscience" that "empowered Islamophobes". They also disputed the "dodgy 84 per cent statistic".

In 2020, the Home Office published a report titled 'Group-based Child Sexual Exploitation Characteristics of Offending'. The accompanying literature review largely agreed with Cockbain and Tufail's criticisms of the Quilliam report. Citing their paper in Race & Class, it stated that Quilliam's findings are "not suitable for drawing conclusions about ethnicity of group-based [child sexual exploitation] offenders".

The literature review did cite studies finding an overrepresentation of "Asians" among child sexual exploitation offenders (though typically much less than 84%). Yet based on the quality of evidence, it concluded that "it is not possible to draw any conclusions as to whether some ethnicities have a greater involvement in group-based offending compared with others".

What's going on? Are Muslims merely overrepresented among grooming gang offenders, as opposed to comprising the vast majority? Are they not overrepresented at all?

I believe the best available evidence suggests that Quilliam's original 84% figure is approximately correct. However, this vast overrepresentation is somewhat less shocking than it initially appears. Let me explain.

The "best available evidence" to which I refer is a paper by two academics, Kish Bhatti-Sinclair and Charles Sutcliffe, titled 'Group Localised Child Sexual Exploitation Offenders: Who and Why?' It was published in 2020 in Seen and Heard - the journal of Nagalro (a professional association for social workers). The paper is also available on the Social Science Research Network.

To estimate the ethnic composition of grooming gang offenders, Bhatti- Sinclair and Sutcliffe obtained data on all relevant prosecutions between 1997 and 2017 "of which we are aware" from over two thousand media reports. There were an average of over twenty reports per case, and they exhibited "almost complete agreement, often repeating the same quotes and phrases".

The researchers acknowledge that their reliance on media reports may have led to bias: "less newsworthy trials, possibly those with white British perpetrators, may have been missed; while more sensational trials involving Asian Muslim perpetrators may have been covered more prominently in the media". On the other hand, some cases involving Muslims may not have been prosecuted "due to fears of accusations of racial bias".

Bhatti-Sinclair and Sutcliffe identified 73 relevant prosecutions involving 498 accused perpetrators. They determined the accused perpetrators' ethnicities from their names (a method that is common in medical and demographic research).

Overall, 83% were Muslim - which is almost identical to Quilliam's figure of 84%. Based on some reasonable, back-of-the-envelope calculations, the researchers conclude: "it is very unlikely that the high proportion of Muslim names identified in our data is due to the exclusion of a large number of non- Muslim offenders". So even if the true figure's less than 83%, it's unlikely to be much less.

Okay, why do I say "this vast overrepresentation is somewhat less shocking than it initially appears"? The reason is that "grooming gangs" is quite a specific category. As Bhatti-Sinclair and Sutcliffe note, "group-based localised child sexual exploitation" (the technical term for grooming gangs) is a subset of child sexual exploitation, which is in turn a subset of child sexual abuse.

Muslims appear to be massively overrepresented among grooming gang offenders, but it's not clear that they're overrepresented among child sexual abusers in general. As the researchers note, in the year 2015, "5,879 mostly white offenders were successfully prosecuted for child sexual abuse". Yet the number of people prosecuted for grooming gang offences over the entire period from 1997 and 2017 was "only" 498 (which is 25 per year, on average). Needless to say, 25 is a small percentage of 5,879. Now, there are obviously some caveats. One major reason so few people have been prosecuted for grooming gang offences is that authorities often failed to act for fear of appearing "racist". There would have been more prosecutions, perhaps many more, in the absence of this fear.

Another caveat is that the average number of victims per grooming gang offender may be higher than for other categories of child sexual abuse. As you'll recall, there were more than 1,400 victims in Rotherham alone. In addition, the level of abuse to which grooming gang victims were subjected may be higher than for other categories of child sexual abuse. Violent gang rape is clearly more serious than, say, distribution of pornographic images.

It's possible that weighting by number of victims, Muslims are overrepresented among child sexual abusers in general; or that they're overrepresented among the most serious abusers.

One reason to think they aren't is that "Asians" (a broad category that includes Britons of Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi origin) are underrepresented among those found guilty of sexual activity with minors. According to the latest data from 2017, only 4.6% of such individuals (for whom ethnicity was given) were Asian. Yet as of 2021, Asians make up 9.3% of the population.

Asians were also slightly underrepresented among those found guilty of all sexual offences, making up 7.9% of such individuals (for whom ethnicity was given). Whether ethnicity was less likely to be given for Asian and other non- white offenders, I don't know.

In any case, the biggest scandal of the whole grooming gang affair is the one Andrew Norfolk highlighted back in 2011: the fact that authorities turned a blind eye to abuse for reasons that basically amount to political correctness; they allowed vulnerable girls to be victimised so that no one would appear "racist".

Regardless of what a comprehensive analysis would show, we already know that some individuals in England managed to get away with extremely serious crimes purely because of their ethnicity and that of their victims.

I'll leave you with this one last thing to think about. The new 2025 sentencing guidelines are a clear example of 2 tier justice

Does this mean the ethnic minority grooming gangs will get a lesser sentence because in their home country of Pakistan sex with underage girls is the norm, and he knows no different? THE BRITISH PUBLIC NEEDS TO STOP LETTING THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA GAS LIGHT THEM. WAKE UP.

Documentary by Sorious Samura, a Sierra Leonean journalist on gang rapes in London. The London Metropolitan Police Service has collected statistics on gang rape. Filmmaker Sorious Samura studied statistics on 29 gang rapes and found that "a high proportion were committed by black and mixed-race young men". (something else the media doesn't want to talk about)